Sharon Tate 1969

The Conspiracy Theory behind the Manson Murders

Born in Beverly Hills, California, Mae was the daughter of the prominent Wilshire Boulevard Temple Rabbi Edgar Magnin and great-granddaughter of Isaac Magnin, founder of the I. Magnin clothing stores. In her early life, she was a married housewife with five children and living in Southern California. After the Kennedy assassination, she bought the 26-volume Warren Commission Hearings and started studying, for herself, the evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone assassin. 

In May 1971, after seven years of research, Mae appeared as a guest on KLRB, a local FM radio station independently owned. The response to her appearance was so good she became a regular weekly guest and afterward had her own talk show Dialogue: Conspiracy (later changed to World Watchers International).

In 1983 Mae's show was picked up by listener-sponsored KAZU FM in Pacific Grove. She died in Carmel Valley, California in 1988.

She also published articles in Paul Krassner's magazine
The Realist. Mae Brussell discusses the Manson and La Bianca Murders Fast forward to 1 hour 36 minutes Radio Interview HERE


California was where the flower children were. Big Sur was the home of people like Joan Baez, Henry Miller, free souls, artists roaming. California was an important state in terms of conspiracies to kill candidates and presidents, and to effect national policy. It's part of the military-industrial-complex. I'm going to explain why the murder of Sharon Tate and the other persons in her home was a political massacre.

Charles "Tex" Watson

Other researchers have done work on John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. I was the first researcher in the United States to turn the other peoples' minds to the fact that the same lawyers, the same planners, the same teams originated this particular massacre, and what effect it would have on our society. 

It had to be planned well in advanced of when it happened. I'm going to give you my conclusions on the Manson—I call it the Manson trial because nobody talks about it being Charles Watson's massacre. That's the boy who killed seven people, but the news media associates the name Charles Manson [with the killings].

Charles "Tex" Watson

Manson made the picture on the cover of Life; He is the man that you associate with killing Sharon Tate. Many people don't even know the name Charles Watson, because you're not supposed to know it.

Right now (1971) there's a hung jury in Los Angeles on the decision of whether Charles Watson is guilty of murdering seven people. He was in the home. He did the stabbing forty times. He wrote "death to the pigs" on the door. The jury can't decide if he was guilty. My conclusions are, number one: that all of these persons involved—the major people—are agent provocateurs.

They come at a time to increase violence, to come down on a segment of our society prior to an election year to make law and order necessary to protect us from the people at large in our society.

Number two: Charles Manson was a patsy. He is identical, historically, to Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and James Earl Ray. Charles Manson killed nobody in the Sharon Tate home or in the La Bianca home. He was being charged with these murders and he didn't kill any one of those seven people. He was used. He was a person who had been in jail twenty-two of his thirty-two years of life.

He was the product of our penal system. He was not a hippie or a part of the youth culture. They bought him a guitar, let his hair grow, put a leather jacket on him, gave him money, gave him a bus and credit cards, and told him to do his thing. 

It was like James Earl Ray was a part of our penal system. He was in Missouri in jail, he met with certain persons, and the next day he was out and there was twenty, thirty thousand dollars of money spent. He traveled continents and everywhere. He was to be used at a certain time and place.

Charles Manson was identical to James Earl Ray, as a product of our penal system. He was used by the news media to slam down on the hippies. We could do one hour on the news control of how your brain is shaped to believe that Charles Manson made a robot out of a nice white Christian boy from Texas. Isn't this terrible? This kind of a criminal mind? Manson was used.


Dee Gilbert said...

I was 10 when this happened and reading the newspaper in my grandmothers house.I will never forget it being one of those, "where were you when that happened type of deal " Sharon Tate was so beautiful and I remember my young mind could not comprehend the horror of her demise along with the others. Good Story Kim.

Michael Lynn said...

"Charlie was /is a tad bizarre !!"

GhostDancer said...

getting that many people brutally dead with only the help of hippy chicks takes some doing ,for sure. Chareles Watson was a powerfuland well skilled killer, Manson didnt have the stomach to be on hand,
favourite quote in referense to the weird parties at the "Spiril Starcase"hosted by convicted murderer Phil Spector.
Manson said " I think dark spiritual influences effected our group from those parties , we werent intop that weird shit"

Ellie said...

It was a drug burn gone wrong. Manson went back to "see what his children had done" and he had killed before.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...